| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080608103835.0c0b1e83@osprey.hogchain.net> Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 10:38:35 -0500 From: Jay Cliburn <jacliburn@...lsouth.net> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: w@....eu, pupilla@...mail.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, chrisw@...s-sol.org, jeff@...zik.org Subject: Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 07:10:51 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote: > If you ask me in the future about the status of a -stable > patch from the networking, I'll let you know exactly what > is happening to that patch wrt. stable. I rarely forget > to submit an appropriate patch, and when I do forget you > merely have to let me know (rather than submitting it > to -stable directly, please don't do that) so that I can > fit it in with what I plan to submit to -stable already. As a netdev driver maintainer, I've been following this workflow for patches that need to go to -stable: 1. I submit a mainline patch to Jeff Garzik. 2. Jeff submits to David. 3. David submits to Linus. 4. Linus merges patch into mainline. 5. I extract mainline commit ID. 6. I apply and test patch against appropriate 2.6.x.y git tree. 7. I submit patch directly to -stable. David's admonition tells me I'm doing it wrong, and that I should submit the stable patch to Jeff as well. Am I right? Jay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists