--- super.c.orig 2008-06-08 20:49:26.153047364 +0200 +++ super.c 2008-06-08 20:45:20.812047463 +0200 @@ -1188,31 +1188,31 @@ int res = 0; if (le32_to_cpu(es->s_rev_level) > EXT3_MAX_SUPP_REV) { - printk (KERN_ERR "EXT3-fs warning: revision level too high, " - "forcing read-only mode\n"); + printk (KERN_ERR "EXT3-fs on %s warning: revision level too high, " + "forcing read-only mode\n", sb->s_id); res = MS_RDONLY; } if (read_only) return res; if (!(sbi->s_mount_state & EXT3_VALID_FS)) - printk (KERN_WARNING "EXT3-fs warning: mounting unchecked fs, " - "running e2fsck is recommended\n"); + printk (KERN_WARNING "EXT3-fs on %s warning: mounting unchecked fs, " + "running e2fsck is recommended\n", sb->s_id); else if ((sbi->s_mount_state & EXT3_ERROR_FS)) printk (KERN_WARNING - "EXT3-fs warning: mounting fs with errors, " - "running e2fsck is recommended\n"); + "EXT3-fs on %s warning: mounting fs with errors, " + "running e2fsck is recommended\n", sb->s_id); else if ((__s16) le16_to_cpu(es->s_max_mnt_count) >= 0 && le16_to_cpu(es->s_mnt_count) >= (unsigned short) (__s16) le16_to_cpu(es->s_max_mnt_count)) printk (KERN_WARNING - "EXT3-fs warning: maximal mount count reached, " - "running e2fsck is recommended\n"); + "EXT3-fs on %s warning: maximal mount count reached, " + "running e2fsck is recommended\n", sb->s_id); else if (le32_to_cpu(es->s_checkinterval) && (le32_to_cpu(es->s_lastcheck) + le32_to_cpu(es->s_checkinterval) <= get_seconds())) printk (KERN_WARNING - "EXT3-fs warning: checktime reached, " - "running e2fsck is recommended\n"); + "EXT3-fs on %s warning: checktime reached, " + "running e2fsck is recommended\n", sb->s_id); #if 0 /* @@@ We _will_ want to clear the valid bit if we find inconsistencies, to force a fsck at reboot. But for @@ -1339,8 +1339,8 @@ } if (bdev_read_only(sb->s_bdev)) { - printk(KERN_ERR "EXT3-fs: write access " - "unavailable, skipping orphan cleanup.\n"); + printk(KERN_ERR "EXT3-fs on %s: write access " + "unavailable, skipping orphan cleanup.\n", sb->s_id); return; }