linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Speed up "make headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:45:34 +0200
From:	Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
Cc:	geert@...ux-m68k.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	zippel@...ux-m68k.org, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Speed up "make headers_*"

On 8 jun 2008, at 19:34, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>> Assuming we _don't_ want the ac_ahz member to be included on m68k, 
>>> this
>>> should fix it (is __mc68000__ the right thing to use?)...
>>
>> I think __m68k__ is preferred, it's harder to confuse for one of the
>> tuning symbols (that is, __mc68040__ and friends).
>
> __m68k__ wasn't pre-defined by gcc before 3.4.

Darn, I knew I should have checked the history.  __mc68000__ is
the best thing to use, then, some people still use 3.3 (don't ask
me why).


Segher

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/