linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm 09/25] fix pagecache reclaim referenced bit check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1212919326.19205.99.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Sun, 08 Jun 2008 12:02:06 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lee.schermerhorn@...com,
	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, mbligh@...igh.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 09/25] fix pagecache reclaim referenced bit check

On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 21:08 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 18:04:51 -0700
> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> > Changelog should spell all this out, I guess.
> 
> It's not the Changelog I'm worried about as much as the
> people who are trying to read the code afterwards.

Guess what these people turn to when they look for the rationale of a
change? - the Changelog :-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/