[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adatzg28sws.fsf@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:38:59 -0700
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To: Stefan Roscher <ossrosch@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>,
"OF-EWG" <ewg@...ts.openfabrics.org>,
general@...ts.openfabrics.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"LinuxPPC-Dev" <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>, hnguyen@...ibm.com,
fenkes@...ibm.com, raisch@...ibm.com, TKLEIN@...ibm.com,
THEMANN@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] IB/ehca: In case of lost interrupts, trigger EOI to reenable interrupts
> + if (desc->chip && desc->chip->eoi)
> + desc->chip->eoi(irq);
This doesn't seem like the type of thing a device driver should be
doing. Both patches are rather short on changelog text -- what is the
issue here and how does this fix it?
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists