[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080609210055.GK3542@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 17:00:55 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
Cc: Amul Shah <amul.shah@...sys.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hpa@...or.com, anderson@...hat.com,
"Romer, Benjamin M" <Benjamin.Romer@...sys.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] Add flags parameter to reserve_bootmem_generic()
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 10:57:34PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> * Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> [2008-06-09 16:54]:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 10:42:11PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> > > Hi Vivek,
> > >
> > > * Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> [2008-06-09 16:29]:
> > > >
> > > > Can you please put some more explanation comment here to explain that
> > > > why it is ok to return with success, despite the fact that we never
> > > > reserved any memory.
> > >
> > > Do you think that's ok?
> > >
> > > When booting the kdump kernel, the MP tables (for example,
> > > or other firmware-reserved memory) of the BIOS are beyond
> > > end_pfn. (kexec-tools adds exactmap parameters to the kernel
> > > so that the E820 map is no longer used.) Therefore, it's ok
> > > to return "success" here. For normal boot, the MP tables
> > > must be reserved normally.
> > >
> >
> > Looks good. Thanks
>
> Should I resend the whole patch series to Linus for inclusion?
>
I am really not sure. :-). In the past, Andrew picked up the patches, kept
in his tree for couple of days and if something is important, he will push
it out to Linus.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists