[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <484D9A72.4010004@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:02:42 -0300
From: Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, hugh@...itas.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] x86: move enabling of io_apic to prepare_cpus
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Glauber Costa wrote:
>
>> This one does enable_IO_APIC in the init_uniprocessor too, and should
>> account for the !smp case.
>
> Hmm, it looks a little bit better, but why do you want to call
> enable_IO_APIC() separately in the first place? There is a comment
> stating: "Enable IO APIC before setting up error vector," but why is it
> needed on 64-bit systems? Especially as the very same system may run a
> 32-bit kernel and then it suddenly would not have to do this anymore?
> Strange...
This was reported by Yinghai, but I think he already answered to that.
> Also since you are cleaning up this code -- why don't you actually take
> the opportunity and get rid of the horrible #ifdefs interspersed
> throughout?
throughout where?
They're all over the place ;)
My next target would be per-cpu data. But that's because there's _a lot_
of code in the tree that got ifdefs between 32 and 64-bit because of
differences in that, specially irq statistics. A macro would do, but if
we're gonna do it, let's do it right.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists