lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5BF78BCE8D9BF14A83F836BD9E3916BA0DDFC3@blrms.slti.sanyo.co.in>
Date:	Mon, 9 Jun 2008 05:51:52 +0530
From:	"Gururaja Hebbar K R" <gururajakr@...yo.co.in>
To:	"Nicolas Ferre" <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	"Pierre Ossman" <drzeus@...eus.cx>,
	"ARM Linux Mailing List" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"Linux Kernel list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: mmc_test : some results

Hi Nicolas,

Could you please be kind enough to share the test program so that we can
test mmc driver on other platforms.

 i have a customized arm9 versatile board with mmci controller and
would like to test the same

TIA,

Regards
Gururaja


-----Original Message-----
From: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk
[mailto:linux-arm-kernel-bounces@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk] On Behalf Of
Nicolas Ferre
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 8:31 AM
To: Pierre Ossman; ARM Linux Mailing List; Linux Kernel list
Subject: mmc_test : some results

Hi Pierre,

Here are the results of a mmc_test run played on at91_mci after applying
this patch series :
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/30/201

I skipped some of the tests just to concentrate on those ones.

Can you tell me if the test is correct : are the errors reported for the
xfer_size tests the normal behavior (I assume yes because a failure is
simulated) ?

~ # echo 1  > /sys/class/mmc_host/mmc0/mmc0\:e624/test
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 1. Basic write (no data verification)...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Test case 2. Basic read (no data verification)...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Test case 3. Basic write (with data verification)...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Test case 4. Basic read (with data verification)...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Test case 5. Multi-block write...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Test case 6. Multi-block read...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Test case 7. Correct xfer_size at write (start failure)...
mmc0: Result: ERROR (-84)
mmc0: Test case 8. Correct xfer_size at read (start failure)...
mmc0: Result: ERROR (-110)
mmc0: Test case 9. Correct xfer_size at write (midway failure)...
mmc0: Result: ERROR (-84)
mmc0: Test case 10. Correct xfer_size at read (midway failure)...
mmc0: Result: ERROR (-110)
mmc0: Tests completed.
~ #

Thanks, regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre


-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin:
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
FAQ:        http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/faq.php
Etiquette:  http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ