linux-kernel - Re: [i2c] Frame buffers and early i2c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:18:53 +0200
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	Ben Dooks <ben@...ff.org>
Cc:	Uli Luckas <u.luckas@...d.de>,
	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, adaplas@...il.com,
	Linux I2C <i2c@...sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [i2c] Frame buffers and early i2c

On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:02:50 +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:31:19AM +0200, Uli Luckas wrote:
> > Just changing the initcall to subsys really did the trick. I thought, this was 
> > the first thing I tried and I thought it crashed my device. But obviousely I 
> > had some other problem.
> > If Russell gives his Ack, could this be pushed upstream through i2c?
> 
> Does this work if the code is built as a module?

subsys_initcall degrades to module_init in modules, so Uli's patch
doesn't change anything in that case.

> BTW, if people do have these sort of dependencies, then modules
> are another way of sorting out the load order, unless you have
> the module autoload enabled.

-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/