[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <484E7B03.8000604@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:00:51 -0300
From: Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
CC: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, hugh@...itas.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] x86: move enabling of io_apic to prepare_cpus
Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@...ux-mips.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>>
>>>> we need clear_IO_APIC before enable setup error vector, in case there
>>>> is wrong setting in ioapic by BIOS...
>>> Fair enough, although it is still interesting why it would only trigger
>>> in the 64-bit mode and why shouldn't the BIOS be fixed instead.
>> Then again -- what if X86_LOCAL_APIC is set, but X86_IO_APIC is not?
>
> config X86_LOCAL_APIC
> def_bool y
> depends on X86_64 || (X86_32 && (X86_UP_APIC || ((X86_VISWS ||
> SMP) && !X86_VOYAGER) || X86_GENERICARCH))
>
> config X86_IO_APIC
> def_bool y
> depends on X86_64 || (X86_32 && (X86_UP_IOAPIC || (SMP &&
> !(X86_VISWS || X86_VOYAGER)) || X86_GENERICARCH))
>
> for 64bit, those are all set.
>
> for 32bit, may need to null stub if X86_IO_APIC is not set
>
> YH
Fair Enough.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists