[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19f34abd0806100742v176f50e8se463d2e70df44332@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:42:41 +0200
From: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To: "Michael Buesch" <mb@...sch.de>
Cc: "Miles Lane" <miles.lane@...il.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"FUJITA Tomonori" <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: BUG: NULL pointer dereference at 00000000 -- IP: [<f8e783d5>] :b43:b43_dma_mapping_error+0x16/0x155
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 June 2008 16:34:21 Michael Buesch wrote:
>> On Tuesday 10 June 2008 16:29:17 Vegard Nossum wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de> wrote:
>> > > On Tuesday 10 June 2008 16:09:37 Miles Lane wrote:
>> > >> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000
>> > >> IP: [<f8e783d5>] :b43:b43_dma_mapping_error+0x16/0x155
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > It seems to crash at
>> > > 60 extern const struct dma_mapping_ops *dma_ops;
>> > > 61
>> > > 62 static inline int dma_mapping_error(dma_addr_t dma_addr)
>> > > 63 {
>> > > 64 if (dma_ops->mapping_error)
>> > > 65 return dma_ops->mapping_error(dma_addr);
>> > > 66
>> > > 67 return (dma_addr == bad_dma_address);
>> > > 68 }
>> >
>> > No, this is wrong.
>> >
>> > /* Check if a DMA mapping address is invalid. */
>> > static bool b43_dma_mapping_error(struct b43_dmaring *ring,
>> > dma_addr_t addr,
>> > size_t buffersize, bool dma_to_device)
>> > {
>> > if (unlikely(dma_mapping_error(ring->dev->dev->dma_dev, addr)))
>> >
>> > It crashes on this line ---^
>>
>> Which calls dma_mapping_error(), correct?
>>
Yes. Sorry, I should have explained. It happened before the call to
dma_mapping_error(), so it has to be during the argument processing.
addr2line -i ftw ;-) (shows inlines)
$ addr2line -e drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.o -i 24cf9
drivers/net/wireless/b43/dma.c:521
>> But you are right. I see the bug now.
>> ring->dev is assigned after the call.
>> I wonder why it works reliably on all of my machines.
>>
>
> Ehm no wait a second...
> What strange tree are you looking at?
> This is a copy of the code from my local tree.
>
> 516 /* Check if a DMA mapping address is invalid. */
> 517 static bool b43_dma_mapping_error(struct b43_dmaring *ring,
> 518 dma_addr_t addr,
> 519 size_t buffersize, bool dma_to_device)
> 520 {
> 521 if (unlikely(dma_mapping_error(addr)))
> 522 return 1;
>
> This code is perfectly fine.
> This must be some merge error in some upstream tree.
I am looking at v2.6.26-rc5-mm2.
This change comes from
commit 353c409463ecba63c3a41a992d3f5fba935eada9
Author: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Date: Fri May 23 19:02:30 2008 +0000
dma-mapping-add-the-device-argument-to-dma_mapping_error
Add per-device dma_mapping_ops support for CONFIG_X86_64 as POWER
architecture does:
This enables us to cleanly fix the Calgary IOMMU issue that some devices
are not behind the IOMMU (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/8/423).
I think that per-device dma_mapping_ops support would be also helpful for
KVM people to support PCI passthrough but Andi thinks that this makes it
difficult to support the PCI passthrough (see the above thread). So I
CC'ed this to KVM camp. Comments are appreciated.
A pointer to dma_mapping_ops to struct dev_archdata is added. If the
pointer is non NULL, DMA operations in asm/dma-mapping.h use it. If it's
NULL, the system-wide dma_ops pointer is used as before.
If it's useful for KVM people, I plan to implement a mechanism to register
a hook called when a new pci (or dma capable) device is created (it works
with hot plugging). It enables IOMMUs to set up an appropriate
dma_mapping_ops per device.
The major obstacle is that dma_mapping_error doesn't take a pointer to the
device unlike other DMA operations. So x86 can't have dma_mapping_ops per
device. Note all the POWER IOMMUs use the same dma_mapping_error function
so this is not a problem for POWER but x86 IOMMUs use different
dma_mapping_error functions.
The first patch adds the device argument to dma_mapping_error. The patch
is trivial but large since it touches lots of drivers and dma-mapping.h in
all the architecture.
(Added to Cc.)
Vegard
--
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists