[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080610153702.4019e042@cuia.bos.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:37:02 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lee.schermerhorn@...com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
eric.whitney@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 13/25] Noreclaim LRU Infrastructure
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jun 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > And it will take longer to get those problems sorted out if 32-bt
> > machines aren't even compiing the new code in.
>
> The problem is going to be less if we dependedn on
> CONFIG_PAGEFLAGS_EXTENDED instead of 64 bit. This means that only certain
> 32bit NUMA/sparsemem configs cannot do this due to lack of page flags.
>
> I did the pageflags rework in part because of Rik's project.
I think your pageflags work freed up a number of bits on 32
bit systems, unless someone compiles a 32 bit system with
support for 4 memory zones (2 bits ZONE_SHIFT) and 64 NUMA
nodes (6 bits NODE_SHIFT), in which case we should still
have 24 bits for flags.
Of course, having 64 NUMA nodes and a ZONE_SHIFT of 2 on
a 32 bit system is probably total insanity already. I
suspect very few people compile 32 bit with NUMA at all,
except if it is an architecture that uses DISCONTIGMEM
instead of zones, in which case ZONE_SHIFT is 0, which
will free up space too :)
--
All Rights Reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists