[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1213130012.20459.58.camel@localhost>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:33:32 -0400
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...il.com>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.26-rc4] mount.nfsv4/memory poisoning issues...
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 16:13 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> We can't call nfs_callback_down() until after nfs_callback_up()
> returns, so we're guaranteed to have "task" set to a valid task
> (presuming that nfs_callback_up() doesn't return error). We also can't
> return from nfs_callback_down() until after the nfs_callback_svc() has
> exited. kthread_stop() will block until it does.
The code I'm alluding to is in kthread():
/* OK, tell user we're spawned, wait for stop or wakeup */
__set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
complete(&create->started);
schedule();
if (!kthread_should_stop())
ret = threadfn(data);
schedule() is called _after_ the complete() call, and _before_ we
execute threadfn() a.k.a. nfs_callback_svc(). If nfs_alloc_client() has
time to call nfs_callback_down() before the above thread gets scheduled
back in, then threadfn() doesn't get called at all, since
kthread_should_stop() is true.
Cheers
Trond
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists