[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1213135535.7261.10.camel@nimitz>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:05:35 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, clameter@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lee.schermerhorn@...com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
eric.whitney@...com, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 13/25] Noreclaim LRU Infrastructure
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 14:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Maybe it's time to bite the bullet and kill i386 NUMA support. afaik
> it's just NUMAQ and a 2-node NUMAish machine which IBM made (as400?)
Yeah, IBM sold a couple of these "interesting" 32-bit NUMA machines:
https://www.redbooks.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/tips0267.html?Open
I think those maxed out at 8 nodes, ever. But, no distro ever turned
NUMA on for i386, so no one actually depends on it working. We do have
a bunch of systems that we use for testing and so forth. It'd be a
shame to make these suck *too* much. The NUMA-Q is probably also so
intertwined with CONFIG_NUMA that we'd likely never get it running
again.
I'd rather just bloat page->flags on these platforms or move the
sparsemem/zone/node bits elsewhere than kill NUMA support.
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists