[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080610225222.GG8397@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:52:22 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-staging tree created
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:05:40PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> PURPOSE
>
> The linux-staging tree was created to hold drivers and filesystems and
> other semi-major additions to the Linux kernel that are not ready to be
> merged at this point in time. It is here for companies and authors to
> get a wider range of testing, and to allow for other members of the
> community to help with the development of these features for the
> eventual inclusion into the main kernel tree.
>
> This tree will be included in the daily linux-next builds, and will get
> testing by all users of that tree.
Does this mean that the nature of linux-next is changing? I thought
the whole point of linux-next was only to have what would be pushed to
Linus in the near future, so we could check for patch compatibility
issues. For that reason, for example, I don't push the unstable set
of patches in the ext4 tree to linux-next, since they aren't ready for
merging yet in their current form.
But if linux-staging is going to be pushed to linux-next, doesn't that
violate the ground rules of Linux-next? Or are we allowing in this
case because these are filesystems and/or device drivers that don't
exist at all in the mainline tree yet?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists