[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080610074215.GC20851@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:42:16 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
J.A. Magallón <jamagallon@....com>,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com
Subject: Re: [Bug #10614] WARNING: at include/linux/blkdev.h:431 blk_queue_init_tags+0x110/0x11f()
On Tue, Jun 10 2008, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 10:42:56PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed.
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10614
> > Subject : WARNING: at include/linux/blkdev.h:431 blk_queue_init_tags+0x110/0x11f()
> > Submitter : J.A. Magallón <jamagallon@....com>
> > Date : 2008-05-01 02:50 (38 days old)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/30/614
> > Handled-By : Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
> > Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
>
> Did Jens fix this up, or...?
>
> I don't think it was ever a problem, just a false positive by the
> over eager warning code (still, obviously the warning should be
> silenced). J.A., how is the latest git tree going for you?
It's not a real problem, but the WARN() is annoying of course. I think
James had a patch queued up for the SCSI side, apparently it's not
merged yet? CC'ing James.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists