linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] autofs4: fix 32-bit userspace vs 64-bit kernel communications

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <484FD233.20602@openvz.org>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:25:07 +0400
From:	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To:	Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
CC:	autofs mailing list <autofs@...ux.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] autofs4: fix 32-bit userspace vs 64-bit	kernel	communications

> Does the test_thread_flag(TIF_IA32) macro only return true for a 32-bit
> user-space process running within a 64-bit user space environment
> (perhaps I can do away with the check in the autofs daemon, perhaps it
> doesn't quite work correctly)?

Hm... If we fix it in the user level that would also be OK, I
suppose...

> Oh .. so maybe the answer to my question is yes?

It is - we check *only* for the process, that is to receive the 
packet.

> What about other arches offer 32-bit within a 64-bit environment (has
> this been the case on sparc64 at some point)?
> What about the compiler padding on these?

We have no technical ability to check this. First I wanted to
get your opinion about this particular fix for x86 machines.

As far as sparc(64) and other 32-to-64 are concerned - I can
start talking to their users/maintainers to check.

> Don't get me wrong, I'm not against fixing this, in fact I'd like to,
> but I'm concerned it may end up a bit of a can of worms.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/