[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0806111032330.2459-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:39:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: AntonioLin <antonio.lin@...ormicro.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@....com>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [S] Re: [linux-uwb] packet size problem
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, AntonioLin wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I checked srb->device->request_queue->dma_alignment in usb_stor_bulk_Bulk_transport() routine. , the value is 1023.
>
> But in usb_stor_bulk_transfer_sglist, the length of first element in sg array is 3584 which is not divisible by 1024.
>
>
> Can you post your /proc/bus/usb/devices ?
>
> I don't know how to do this, could you descript moe about it ?
> (Sorry,I have few experience about Linux.)
All you have to do is:
cat /proc/bus/usb/devices
Or even just tell your email client to include /proc/bus/usb/devices as
an attachment. However some Linux distributions don't automatically
mount /proc/bus/usb. If yours doesn't, you will have to do (as root):
mount -t usbfs none /proc/bus/usb
before you can access /proc/bus/usb/devices. But in any case it
doesn't matter, since you have checked that the value of dma_alignment
really is 1023.
Jens, this is a question for you. How come we're getting an SG element
whose lenth is 3584 when the request_queue's dma_alignment mask is set
to 1023? Is dma_alignment not the right parameter to set?
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists