linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-staging tree created

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080611162639.GE22134@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:26:39 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Will Newton <will.newton@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-staging tree created

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:45:55AM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
> 
> Would the linux-staging tree be an appropriate place to merge a new
> architecture? Or would that be too large a change and should go via
> its own tree?

That is probably too big to go into -staging and should deserve its own
tree based on the size of patches that have gone into creating a new
architecture in the past.

Do you have an example of one that is currently not included in the main
kernel tree right now?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/