[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4850183B.90609@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:23:55 +0300
From: Anssi Hannula <anssi.hannula@...il.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
CC: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, marcel@...tmann.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] HID: move logitech report quirks
Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>
>>>> static const struct hid_device_id hid_blacklist[] = {
>>>> + { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH,
>>>> USB_DEVICE_ID_MX3000_RECEIVER) },
>>>> + { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH, USB_DEVICE_ID_S510_RECEIVER)
>>>> },
>>>> + { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH,
>>>> USB_DEVICE_ID_S510_RECEIVER_2) },
>>>> { }
>>>> };
>>> This shouldn't be needed as soon as the userspace supports the proper module
>>> autoloading, right?
>> This is needed to tell generic drivers not to bind these, its' generic
>> blacklist. I have no idea how this could be done better with current
>> drivers/base/.
>
> Hmm ... but if we make sure that the order in `modules.order' puts all the
> specialized drivers before the generic one, the binding should be done
> correctly even without blacklist, right?
A little off-topic, but is there a module-init-tools repository with
modules.order handling somewhere, or does it (still) only exist as
not-yet-integrated patches?
--
Anssi Hannula
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists