[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080611031822.GA8228@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:18:22 +0200
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [patch 7/7] powerpc: lockless get_user_pages_fast
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:00:48PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, npiggin@...e.de wrote:
>
> > Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mm.h
> > +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
> > @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static inline int put_page_testzero(stru
> > */
> > static inline int get_page_unless_zero(struct page *page)
> > {
> > - VM_BUG_ON(PageTail(page));
> > + VM_BUG_ON(PageCompound(page));
> > return atomic_inc_not_zero(&page->_count);
> > }
>
> This is reversing the modification to make get_page_unless_zero() usable
> with compound page heads. Will break the slab defrag patchset.
Is the slab defrag patchset in -mm? Because you ignored my comment about
this change that assertions should not be weakened until required by the
actual patchset. I wanted to have these assertions be as strong as
possible for the lockless pagecache patchset.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists