linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm 11/24] pageflag helpers for configed-out flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080611130145.2a202339.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:01:45 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lee.schermerhorn@...com,
	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, Lee.Schermerhorn@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 11/24] pageflag helpers for configed-out flags

On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:42:25 -0400
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:

> Define proper false/noop inline functions for noreclaim page
> flags when !defined(CONFIG_NORECLAIM_LRU)

I changed that to CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU.

Did we agree that the presence of this config variable is undesirable? 
If so, what's involved in making it go away?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/