[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1213216981.6436.74.camel@lts-notebook>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:43:01 -0400
From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 11/24] pageflag helpers for configed-out flags
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 16:32 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:28:03 -0400
> Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 13:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:42:25 -0400
> > > Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Define proper false/noop inline functions for noreclaim page
> > > > flags when !defined(CONFIG_NORECLAIM_LRU)
> > >
> > > I changed that to CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU.
> >
> > I noticed that the vmstat items [perhaps these will go away] still use
> > "noreclaim".
>
> $ cat /proc/vmstat
> nr_free_pages 3887198
> nr_inactive_anon 5043
> nr_active_anon 2182
> nr_inactive_file 67121
> nr_active_file 49045
> nr_unevictable 0
> nr_mlock 0
>
> Or am I looking at the wrong thing?
Do you have patch 21/24 applied? In 26-rc5-mm1, I see the
noreclaim_pgs_* vmstat items. They're in the patch 21 you just posted,
as well.
Again, we might decide to drop that patch from the merge. I found the
stats useful during debug and test, but I don't know that they provide
any value in the longer term.
Lee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists