[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48503EB9.6000606@compro.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:08:09 -0400
From: Mark Hounschell <markh@...pro.net>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <linux-os@...logic.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
solsTiCe d'Hiver <solstice.dhiver@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: no cpu MHz in /proc/cpuinfo on 2.6.25.4-rt6
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:37:38 -0400
> Mark Hounschell <markh@...pro.net> wrote:
>
>>> Mark
>>>
>> Ok, what would one use besides the tsc to take a fast high-res time
>> stamp in a kernel module that could also be used in user land (same
>> time source) to for instance calculate the the time between an event
>> in the kernel to an event in user land?
>>
>> do_gettimeofday / gettimeofday are not really acceptable.
>
>
> btw you also changed the problem from "what is the cpu frequency" to
> "how usable is rdtsc for time". My entire point was that these weren't
> related...
>
>
If they are not the same how do you know at what rate the tsc is counting.
But back to "how usable is rdtsc for time", is there a
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &time) equivalent that can be used in the kernel?
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists