[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080611142909.2e18f2b1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:29:09 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se
Cc: adobriyan@...allels.com, akpm@...uxfoundation.org,
viro@....linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
busybox@...ybox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seq_file: make seq_lseek accept SEEK_END
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:52:55 +0200
Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se> wrote:
> busybox has been fixed, at least in trunk, not to do
> xlseek(fd, 0, SEEK_END) anymore to address this problem.
> Perhaps there are other apps out there that needs this too, but I don't
> know of any. Older busyboxes needs this change though.
> I have moved on and don't have a setup handy where I can test this.
> Perhaps someone at the bb list has, CC:ing bb list.
>
Nevertheless it'd be nice to fix old versions.
To some extent that depends on when we broke it. See below.
>
> On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 15:01 +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > Apologies for delay, such simple thing should have been sent long ago.
> > Joakim, please, confirm.
> > -------------------------------------------
> > [PATCH] seq_file: make seq_lseek accept SEEK_END
> >
> > and pretend seq_files have zero length. This should be enough
> > to fix busybox start-stop-daemon:
> > http://marc.info/?t=120836691600002&r=1&w=2
> >
> > It does xlseek(fd, 0, SEEK_END) to estimate amount of memory to malloc
> > but satisfied with 0. Sudden -EINVAL from lseek(2) breaks it.
> >
> > X-Introduced-By: f16278c679aa72e28288435b313ba2d4494d6be5
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...allels.com>
> > ---
> >
> > fs/seq_file.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > --- a/fs/seq_file.c
> > +++ b/fs/seq_file.c
> > @@ -254,6 +254,8 @@ loff_t seq_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
> > switch (origin) {
> > case 1:
> > offset += file->f_pos;
> > + case 2:
> > + /* pretend it's zero length */
> > case 0:
> > if (offset < 0)
> > break;
> >
> >
Is returning zero logical, given what we do with SEEK_SET?
afait we _could_ just do
offset = <largenum>
/* fall through */
and let the SEEK_SET code do its thing. But I might have misread it.
But still, it looks like it'd be possible to return a true(ish) value
from SEEK_END?
> > X-Introduced-By: f16278c679aa72e28288435b313ba2d4494d6be5
Please don't do that. Instead, quote the commit ID _and_ the first few
lines of the commit itself, like:
commit f16278c679aa72e28288435b313ba2d4494d6be5
Author: Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@....com>
Date: Fri Mar 21 18:46:59 2008 -0500
Change pagemap output format to allow for future reporting of huge pages
And here we see one reason: that commit cannot be the one which
introduced this problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists