[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080612081029.GA1403@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:10:29 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86: minor PAT adaptations
* Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com> wrote:
> Following some patches to slightly adapt the PAT code.
>
> patch 1 - enable PAT for all AMD CPUs that have the PAT feature flag set
> patch 2 - fix up paranoia check in pat_init and fix the logic to
> enable/disable PAT (IMHO the current code enables PAT on all
> Transmeta and Centaur CPUs even if no PAT feature flag is set)
> (I admit I should have changed the sequence of patches 1 and 2.)
> patch 3 - fix some checkpatch errors
> patch 4 - variable renaming
applied to tip/x86/pat, thanks Andreas. (i presume you'll send a
followup patch for the suggestions that came up in the discussion)
> patch 5 - slightly changing the code that is doing the intersection of
> pat_type and mtrr_type to be more readable (from my point of view)
>
> Patches are against x86/pat (as of version v2.6.26-rc3-6-g46dd98a).
#5 makes sense too, but it didnt apply cleanly:
Applying patch
patches/pat-x86-pat-make-pat-x-mtrr-type-more-readable.patch
patching file arch/x86/mm/pat.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 185.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/mm/pat.c
(it didnt apply neither against tip/x86/pat or tip/master, nor against
linus/master. I guess it's some mixup somewhere.)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists