linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: fair group: fix overflow(was: fix divide by zero)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:49:44 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: fair group: fix overflow(was: fix divide by
	zero)

On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 16:42 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > I think the same thing to do is limit the shares value to something
> > smaller instead of using an even more expensive divide.
> > 
> 
> yes, you are right!
> 
> I found another bug about "the shares value is too large":
> 
> pid1 and pid2 are set affinity to cpu#0
> pid1 is attached to cg1 and pid2 is attached to cg2
> 
> if cg1/cpu.shares = 1024 cg2/cpu.shares = 2000000000
> then pid2 got 100% usage of cpu, and pid1 0%
> 
> if cg1/cpu.shares = 1024 cg2/cpu.shares = 20000000000
> then pid2 got 0% usage of cpu, and pid1 100%
> 
> 
> And a weight of a cfs_rq is the sum of weights of which entities
> are queued on this cfs_rq, so the shares value should be limited
> to a smaller value.

Yeah, a lot of stuff will fall apart when weights grow too large, I
think somewhere the load balance code also assumes weight * NICE_0_LOAD
always fits in a long. So that immediately limits us to 32-10=22 bits
(on 32bit systems).

There might be other funnies..

> I think that (1UL << 18) is a good limited value:
> 1)it's not too large, we can create a lot of group before overflow
> 2)it's several times the weight value for nice=-19 (not too small)

Thanks!

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>

> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index bfb8ad8..fe1b6c7 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -312,12 +312,15 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(task_group_lock);
>  #endif
>  
>  /*
> - * A weight of 0, 1 or ULONG_MAX can cause arithmetics problems.
> + * A weight of 0 or 1 can cause arithmetics problems.
> + * A weight of a cfs_rq is the sum of weights of which entities
> + * are queued on this cfs_rq, so a weight of a entity should not be
> + * too large, so as the shares value of a task group.
>   * (The default weight is 1024 - so there's no practical
>   *  limitation from this.)
>   */
>  #define MIN_SHARES	2
> -#define MAX_SHARES	(ULONG_MAX - 1)
> +#define MAX_SHARES	(1UL << 18)
>  
>  static int init_task_group_load = INIT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD;
>  #endif
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/