linux-kernel - [PATCH] workqueues: insert_work: use "list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:51:20 +0400
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>,
	Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] workqueues: insert_work: use "list_head *" instead of "int tail"

insert_work() inserts the new work_struct before or after cwq->worklist,
depending on the "int tail" parameter. Change it to accept "list_head *"
instead, this shrinks .text a bit and allows us to insert the barrier
after specific work_struct.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>

--- 26-rc2/kernel/workqueue.c~WQ_1_S_TAIL_PREV	2008-05-18 15:44:19.000000000 +0400
+++ 26-rc2/kernel/workqueue.c	2008-06-12 19:12:46.000000000 +0400
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ struct cpu_workqueue_struct *get_wq_data
 }
 
 static void insert_work(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq,
-				struct work_struct *work, int tail)
+			struct work_struct *work, struct list_head *head)
 {
 	set_wq_data(work, cwq);
 	/*
@@ -133,10 +133,7 @@ static void insert_work(struct cpu_workq
 	 * result of list_add() below, see try_to_grab_pending().
 	 */
 	smp_wmb();
-	if (tail)
-		list_add_tail(&work->entry, &cwq->worklist);
-	else
-		list_add(&work->entry, &cwq->worklist);
+	list_add_tail(&work->entry, head);
 	wake_up(&cwq->more_work);
 }
 
@@ -147,7 +144,7 @@ static void __queue_work(struct cpu_work
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&cwq->lock, flags);
-	insert_work(cwq, work, 1);
+	insert_work(cwq, work, &cwq->worklist);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cwq->lock, flags);
 }
 
@@ -337,14 +334,14 @@ static void wq_barrier_func(struct work_
 }
 
 static void insert_wq_barrier(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq,
-					struct wq_barrier *barr, int tail)
+			struct wq_barrier *barr, struct list_head *head)
 {
 	INIT_WORK(&barr->work, wq_barrier_func);
 	__set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, work_data_bits(&barr->work));
 
 	init_completion(&barr->done);
 
-	insert_work(cwq, &barr->work, tail);
+	insert_work(cwq, &barr->work, head);
 }
 
 static int flush_cpu_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
@@ -364,7 +361,7 @@ static int flush_cpu_workqueue(struct cp
 		active = 0;
 		spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
 		if (!list_empty(&cwq->worklist) || cwq->current_work != NULL) {
-			insert_wq_barrier(cwq, &barr, 1);
+			insert_wq_barrier(cwq, &barr, &cwq->worklist);
 			active = 1;
 		}
 		spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
@@ -449,7 +446,7 @@ static void wait_on_cpu_work(struct cpu_
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
 	if (unlikely(cwq->current_work == work)) {
-		insert_wq_barrier(cwq, &barr, 0);
+		insert_wq_barrier(cwq, &barr, cwq->worklist.next);
 		running = 1;
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/