[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200806121244.12173.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:44:11 +1000
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>, Martin Peschke <mp3@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 04/41] cpu ops: Core piece for generic atomic per cpu operations
On Thursday 12 June 2008 10:58:01 Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Thursday 12 June 2008 09:39, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > > 4. The modeling of local_t on atomic_t limits it to 32bit!
> > >
> > > Again wrong. And adding an exclamation mark doesn't make it true.
> >
> > Ewww ... Its atomic_long_t ahh. Ok then there no 32 bit support. What
> > about pointers?
>
> sizeof(long) == sizeof(void *) in Linux, right?
>
> If you were to support just a single data type, long would probably
> be the most useful. Still, it might be more consistent to support
> int and long, same as atomic.
Sure, but in practice these tend to be simple counters: that could well change
when dynamic percpu allocs become first class citizens, but let's not put the
cart before the horse...
Per-cpu seems to be particularly prone to over-engineering: see commit
7ff6f08295d90ab20d25200ef485ebb45b1b8d71 from almost two years ago. Grepping
here reveals that this infrastructure is still not used.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists