lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:52:28 +0800 From: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net> To: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>, autofs mailing list <autofs@...ux.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] autofs4: fix 32-bit userspace vs 64-bit kernel communications On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 16:29 +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > Ian Kent writes: > > What about other arches offer 32-bit within a 64-bit environment (has > > this been the case on sparc64 at some point)? > > What about the compiler padding on these? > > Both ppc64 and sparc64 commonly have 32-bit userspaces. > But 64-bit and mixed 32/64-bit userspaces are of course possible. I believe that both these archs have the same alignment characteristics a x86_64. Can anyone confirm that? Ian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists