[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080612.161416.82163498.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jeff@...zik.org
Cc: sfr@...b.auug.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git patches] net driver updates for .27
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:43:33 -0400
> David Miller wrote:
> > "Author" is always who wrote the patch, and I think it's important to
> > be consistent in that area.
>
> "always"? There are /plenty/ of occasions, usually at big corps, where
> the Author is not the person who wrote the patch, but rather the person
> who sent the patch.
>
> And you'll note that all Linus's tools capture that -- author is patch
> sender -- albeit with optional From parsing from patch commit description.
I guess that's a compelling enough argument. I'll pull your
original tree, thanks Jeff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists