[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080612140048.0051feb2.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:00:48 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"menage@...gle.com" <menage@...gle.com>,
"xemul@...nvz.org" <xemul@...nvz.org>,
"yamamoto@...inux.co.jp" <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] memcg: hardwall hierarhcy for memcg
Thank you. will fix.
-Kame
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:24:23 -0700
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:03:29 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>
> > ---
> > Documentation/controllers/memory.txt | 27 +++++-
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
>
> > Index: temp-2.6.26-rc2-mm1/Documentation/controllers/memory.txt
> > ===================================================================
> > --- temp-2.6.26-rc2-mm1.orig/Documentation/controllers/memory.txt
> > +++ temp-2.6.26-rc2-mm1/Documentation/controllers/memory.txt
> > @@ -237,12 +237,37 @@ cgroup might have some charge associated
> > tasks have migrated away from it. Such charges are automatically dropped at
> > rmdir() if there are no tasks.
> >
> > -5. TODO
> > +5. Hierarchy Model
> > + the kernel supports following kinds of hierarchy models.
>
> The kernel supports the following kinds ....
>
> > + (your middle-ware may support others based on this.)
>
> (Your
> > +
> > + 5-a. Independent Hierarchy
> > + There are no relationship between any cgroups, even among a parent and
>
> is
>
> > + children. This is the default mode. To use this hierarchy, write 0
> > + to root cgroup's memory.hierarchy_model
> > + echo 0 > .../memory.hierarchy_model.
> > +
> > + 5-b. Hardwall Hierarchy.
> > + The resource has to be moved from the parent to the child before use it.
>
> using it.
>
> > + When a child's limit is set to 'val', val of the resource is moved from
> > + the parent to the child. the parent's usage += val.
>
> The parent's usage is incremented by val.
> (if that's what you mean)
>
> > + The amount of children's usage is reported by the file
> > +
> > + - memory.assigned_to_child
> > +
> > + This policy doesn't provide sophisticated automatic resource balancing in
> > + the kernel. But this is very good for strict resource isolation. Users
>
> kernel, but this ...
>
> > + can get high predictability of behavior of applications if this is used
> > + under proper environments.
> > +
> > +
> > +6. TODO
> >
> > 1. Add support for accounting huge pages (as a separate controller)
> > 2. Make per-cgroup scanner reclaim not-shared pages first
> > 3. Teach controller to account for shared-pages
> > 4. Start reclamation when the limit is lowered
> > + (this is already done in Hardwall Hierarchy)
> > 5. Start reclamation in the background when the limit is
> > not yet hit but the usage is getting closer
> > --
>
> ---
> ~Randy
> '"Daemon' is an old piece of jargon from the UNIX operating system,
> where it referred to a piece of low-level utility software, a
> fundamental part of the operating system."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists