[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080612235441.GC4792@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:54:41 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Will Newton <will.newton@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-staging tree created
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 12:37:56PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:45:55AM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
> >>
> >> Would the linux-staging tree be an appropriate place to merge a new
> >> architecture? Or would that be too large a change and should go via
> >> its own tree?
> >
> > That is probably too big to go into -staging and should deserve its own
> > tree based on the size of patches that have gone into creating a new
> > architecture in the past.
>
> Our tree is about 26000 lines of diff, including a few drivers.
That's pretty sizable, I think it deserves its own tree.
> > Do you have an example of one that is currently not included in the main
> > kernel tree right now?
>
> I have a tree that is currently about half way to public consumption,
> although I don't think there's any point pushing it until we have a
> publically available toolchain.
Yeah, that would help as well :)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists