[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080613185414.306b4baa@linux360.ro>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:54:14 +0300
From: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: tzanussi@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
compudj@...stal.dyndns.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
righi.andrea@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] relay: Add buffer-only channels; useful for early
logging.
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:04:57 +0300
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
> Why do we need to change for_each_online_cpu to for_each_present_cpu?
> I guess it's because we don't have all the CPUs online at early
> boot?
Yes, that's true. Only one CPU is online at that early point.
> Wouldn't it then be better to implement CPU hotplug support
> instead?
It's difficult for me to write such code, as I'm unable to test CPU
hotplug; my machines are a Turion X2 laptop and a Athlon Barton desktop
computer. So I can't turn off, or unplug in a software sense, one CPU core.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't see any way to do that in /sys/devices/system/cpu/
But I suppose I could write a patch very carefully, and then submit to
someone that can test this. Anyway, I'll look into this and try to
understand the code without being able to test.
Eduard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists