linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND #3/patch 2.6.26-rc6] net/enc28j60: low power mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200806131121.21346.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:21:21 -0700
From:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Claudio Lanconelli <lanconelli.claudio@...ar.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND #3/patch 2.6.26-rc6] net/enc28j60: low power mode

On Friday 13 June 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I've put these two into my queue, so they are definitely in process now.

Thanks..


> For netdev patches it helps to CC me, since not every patch sent solely 
> to netdev@ is a to-be-applied patch, and might be missed -- or quite 
> often, assumed to be a patch that warrants discussion.

Ah.  I was more used to the convention that all patches should go to
the relevant mailing list (or LKML), and were assumed to be ready to
merge unless they were flagged as "RFC" or the relevant maintainer(s)
issued a NAK or other negative feedback.  When there was an ack or
signoff from the driver maintainer, it was ready to go.

- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/