[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080613072424.GB11976@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:24:24 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
Stable Kernel <stable@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED] x86: set PAE PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT to 44 bits.
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> When a 64-bit x86 processor runs in 32-bit PAE mode, a pte can
>>> potentially have the same number of physical address bits as the
>>> 64-bit host ("Enhanced Legacy PAE Paging"). This means, in theory,
>>> we could have up to 52 bits of physical address in a pte.
>>>
>>> The 32-bit kernel uses a 32-bit unsigned long to represent a pfn.
>>> This means that it can only represent physical addresses up to
>>> 32+12=44 bits wide. Rather than widening pfns everywhere, just set
>>> 2^44 as the Linux x86_32-PAE architectural limit for physical address
>>> size.
>>>
>>
>> applied to tip/x86/cleanups - thanks Jeremy. No urgency for v2.6.26,
>> right?
>
> Not urgent, but it would be nice to have.
ok, cherry-picked it into x86/urgent. This aspect makes it eligible for
v2.6.26:
| This is a bugfix for two cases:
| 1. running a 32-bit PAE kernel on a machine with
| more than 64GB RAM.
| 2. running a 32-bit PAE Xen guest on a host machine with
| more than 64GB RAM
|
| In both cases, a pte could need to have more than 36 bits of physical,
| and masking it to 36-bits will cause fairly severe havoc.
also added a stable@...nel.org Cc: to the commit, so it will be picked
up in stable as well.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists