[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080613090014.GC3139@damson.getinternet.no>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:00:14 +0200
From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] stacktrace: print_stack_trace() cleanup
From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:05:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] stacktrace: print_stack_trace() cleanup
This admittedly doesn't have too many benefits, these are the two I can
think of: shorter code and better atomicity with regards to printk().
(It's been tested with the backtrace self-test code on i386 and x86_64.)
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
---
kernel/stacktrace.c | 9 +++------
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/stacktrace.c b/kernel/stacktrace.c
index b71816e..2ee264b 100644
--- a/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -11,14 +11,11 @@
void print_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace, int spaces)
{
- int i, j;
+ int i;
for (i = 0; i < trace->nr_entries; i++) {
- unsigned long ip = trace->entries[i];
-
- for (j = 0; j < spaces + 1; j++)
- printk(" ");
- print_ip_sym(ip);
+ printk("%*c", 1 + spaces, ' ');
+ print_ip_sym(trace->entries[i]);
}
}
--
1.5.4.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists