linux-kernel - Re: [TCP]: TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT causes leak sockets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080613.023208.78649628.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jun 2008 02:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	mingo@...e.hu
Cc:	kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, vgusev@...nvz.org, mcmanus@...ksong.com,
	xemul@...nvz.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [TCP]: TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT causes leak sockets

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:30:37 +0200

> the 3 reverts have been extensively tested in -tip via:
> 
>  # tip/out-of-tree: 9e5b6ca: tcp: revert DEFER_ACCEPT modifications
> 
> and the distcc problems are fixed. (The locking fix alone did not fix it 
> conclusively in my testing, possibly due to the follow-on observations 
> outlined in your description.)
> 
> Tested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>

I didn't revert all three changes, just the final part of that
3 part series.

Please test the patch I actually applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/