lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 15 Jun 2008 00:58:26 +0200
From:	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...il.com>
Cc:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] debugobjects: fix lockdep warning

Hi,

I don't know whether this is truly the Right Fix; if it isn't, feel free
to re-use my commit template for when the RF appears... ;-)

Daniel, is there any chance you can try it out? Thanks.


Vegard


From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 00:47:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] debugobjects: fix lockdep warning

Daniel J Blueman reported:
| =======================================================
| [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
| 2.6.26-rc5-201c #1
| -------------------------------------------------------
| nscd/3669 is trying to acquire lock:
|  (&n->list_lock){.+..}, at: [<ffffffff802bab03>] deactivate_slab+0x173/0x1e0
|
| but task is already holding lock:
|  (&obj_hash[i].lock){++..}, at: [<ffffffff803fa56f>]
| __debug_object_init+0x2f/0x350
|
| which lock already depends on the new lock.

There are two locks involved here; the first is a SLUB-local lock, and
the second is a debugobjects-local lock. They are basically taken in two
different orders:

1. SLUB { debugobjects { ... } }
2. debugobjects { SLUB { ... } }

This patch changes pattern #2 by trying to fill the memory pool (e.g.
the call into SLUB/kmalloc()) outside the debugobjects lock, so now the
two patterns look like this:

1. SLUB { debugobjects { ... } }
2. SLUB { } debugobjects { ... }

Reported-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
---
 lib/debugobjects.c |   10 +++-------
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c b/lib/debugobjects.c
index a76a5e1..19acf8c 100644
--- a/lib/debugobjects.c
+++ b/lib/debugobjects.c
@@ -110,16 +110,13 @@ static struct debug_obj *lookup_object(void *addr, struct debug_bucket *b)
 }
 
 /*
- * Allocate a new object. If the pool is empty and no refill possible,
- * switch off the debugger.
+ * Allocate a new object. If the pool is empty, switch off the debugger.
  */
 static struct debug_obj *
 alloc_object(void *addr, struct debug_bucket *b, struct debug_obj_descr *descr)
 {
 	struct debug_obj *obj = NULL;
-	int retry = 0;
 
-repeat:
 	spin_lock(&pool_lock);
 	if (obj_pool.first) {
 		obj	    = hlist_entry(obj_pool.first, typeof(*obj), node);
@@ -141,9 +138,6 @@ repeat:
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&pool_lock);
 
-	if (fill_pool() && !obj && !retry++)
-		goto repeat;
-
 	return obj;
 }
 
@@ -261,6 +255,8 @@ __debug_object_init(void *addr, struct debug_obj_descr *descr, int onstack)
 	struct debug_obj *obj;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	fill_pool();
+
 	db = get_bucket((unsigned long) addr);
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&db->lock, flags);
-- 
1.5.4.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ