linux-kernel - Re: [GIT]: Networking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080614.001206.153530204.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	mingo@...e.hu
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...k.pl
Subject: Re: [GIT]: Networking

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 08:03:20 +0200

> once i added the patch below this new warning went away. I'm wondering 
> what this difference is about and why your revert differs from Ilpo's. 

Because I reverted the change we found bugs in.

Ilpo sent you a patch which reverted an entire series of changes
purely so that we could begin to narrow things down.

> It might as well be the right thing to do and the warning just shows 
> something latent.

This is my though still currently because I can't see any reason why
the diff you keep posting would cause a device to transmit timeout.
It's likely a timing thing or something weird like that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/