| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200806152114.33007.dex@dragonslave.de> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:14:32 +0200 From: Daniel Exner <dex@...gonslave.de> To: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> Cc: "Alexey Starikovskiy" <aystarik@...il.com>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu> Subject: Re: linux-next Regression: Unable to locate IOAPIC Hi all, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> To clarify myself: > >> 2.6.25.5: --> relatively fast no IOAPIC Errors in dmesg > >> 2.6.26-rc5: --> relatively no IOAPIC Errors in dmesg > >> 2.6.26-rc5 + git-acpi Patch: --> relatively no IOAPIC Errors in dmesg > >> 2.6.26-rc5 + linux-next snapshot 20080604 --> even slower than before > >> my ide Patch many "unable to locate IOAPIC" Errors > >> > >> > >> So I think the problem lies not in the acpi tree but somewhre else. > >> > >> Is it possible to tell git to explicitly _exclude_ a specific tree while > >> bisecting? > > can you check if the attached patch fix the problem? > it will not check entries before MP_intsrc_info... This fixed it, thanks :) Also maschine feels not as fast as with 2.6.25.x but noticeable faster :) I guss you no longer need the complete dmesg output? Greetings Daniel Exner -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists