[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080615075008.GD29552@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:50:08 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Németh Márton <nm127@...email.hu>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug 10864] [regression][bisected] ~90,000 wakeups as of
2.6.26-rc3
* Németh Márton <nm127@...email.hu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I already mentioned at the bug report that 2.6.26-rc6 this is fixed.
>
> Maybe tell your robot to first check the latest activities in the bug
> report since the last -rc release. What I want also to tell your robot
> that it should mention what actions should be taken in case the bug
> should be still listed or when the bug can be closed.
i think the current regression tracking methods that Rafael uses work
very well and i'd like to thank Rafael for those efforts - to me as a
subsystem maintainer it is a _very_ useful thing.
In this case there was no real harm from the "this bug is already fixed"
condition - just an extra email. Real harm would only come from missed
regressions or from incorrectly closed regressions - but those are not
happening.
note that there is no "robot" involved in changing the state of bugs -
the real important work here is done by Rafael and checking whether a
bug is still relevant is an inevitably manual work. The mails and
reports are auto-generated but crawling discussions and determining the
status of a regression is very hard to automate.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists