linux-kernel - Re: kdump regression: /proc/vmcore is 0 after kdump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080615115553.594e4ad7@kopernikus.site>
Date:	Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:55:53 +0200
From:	Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
To:	"Luming Yu" <luming.yu@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, andrew.patterson@...com,
	Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.cz>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: kdump regression: /proc/vmcore is 0 after kdump

* "Luming Yu" <luming.yu@...il.com> [2008-06-15 17:26]:
>
> My git bisection result indicates the following commit causes the
> kdump regression in 2.6.25-rc1:
> commit 3c75e23784e6ed5f4841de43d0750fd9b37bafcb
> Author: Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@...com>
> Date:   Tue Jan 22 17:18:27 2008 -0700

Can you verify that reverting that commit indeed fixes kdump at your
site?



Bernhard
-- 
Bernhard Walle, SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Architecture Development
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/