[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <009201c8cf58$58909080$09b1b180$@css.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:26:12 +0900
From: "Takashi Nishiie" <t-nishiie@...css.fujitsu.com>
To: "'Jason Baron'" <jbaron@...hat.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <joe@...ches.com>,
<greg@...ah.com>, <nick@...k-andrew.net>, <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/8] dynamic debug
Hi.
Jason Baron wrote:
>Each kernel sub-system seems to have its own way of dealing with
>debugging statements. Some of these methods include 'dprintk',
>'pr_debug', 'dev_debug', 'DEBUGP'. There are also a myriad of
>ways of enabling these statements.
I propose to replace 'Pr_debug', 'Dev_debug', and 'DEBUGP' with
kernel markers. SystemTap is used for the output of the log.
I propose to make it to the function to output only specified
kernel markers as a log and the function in a word like LTTng of
a simple version by using the framework and kernel markers of
ftrace if the log is output by using debugfs.
Thank you,
--
Takashi Nishiie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists