[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1213627148.16944.106.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:39:08 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Daniel K." <dk@...no>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, menage@...gle.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG: NULL pointer dereference] cgroups and RT
scheduling interact badly.
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 15:51 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 15:14 +0200, Daniel K. wrote:
> > Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Does the below work for you?
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> > > ---
> > > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
> > > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> > > @@ -7784,7 +7784,6 @@ static void init_tg_rt_entry(struct task
> > > else
> > > rt_se->rt_rq = parent->my_q;
> > >
> > > - rt_se->rt_rq = &rq->rt;
> > > rt_se->my_q = rt_rq;
> > > rt_se->parent = parent;
> > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rt_se->run_list);
> >
> > Although this patch seems to be correct, this is what shows up on my
> > netconsole, when applying it -- with an offset, do you have other fixes
> > applied as well?
>
> I had indeed, although nothing touching the rt scheduler. I popped all
> my patches and pulled an update from Linus, but I fail to reproduce the
> below.
>
> /me goes look for that burnp6 thing, I used a simple while (1); loop.
found it, still seems to work for me. do you have a funny number of
cpus? or anything else noteworthy?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists