[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1213627742.6538.7.camel@lts-notebook>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:49:02 -0400
From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix double unlock_page() in 2.6.26-rc5-mm3 kernel BUG
at mm/filemap.c:575!
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 11:30 -0400, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 19:13 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:44:44 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This is reproducer of panic. "quick fix" is attached.
> >
> > Thanks - I put that in
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.26-rc5/2.6.26-rc5-mm3/hot-fixes/
> >
> > > But I think putback_lru_page() should be re-designed.
> >
> > Yes, it sounds that way.
>
> Here's a proposed replacement patch that reworks putback_lru_page()
> slightly and cleans up the call sites. I still want to balance the
> get_page() in isolate_lru_page() with a put_page() in putback_lru_page()
> for the primary users--vmscan and page migration. So, I need to drop
> the lock before the put_page() when handed a page with null mapping and
> a single reference count as the page will be freed on put_page() and a
> locked page would bug out in free_pages_check()/bad_page().
>
Below is a fix to the "proposed replacement patch" posted on Friday.
Incorrect test for page->mapping().
Lee
Against: 2.6.26-rc5-mm3
Incremental fix to my proposed patch to "fix double unlock_page() in
2.6.26-rc5-mm3 kernel BUG at mm/filemap.c:575".
"page_mapping(page)" should be "page->mapping" in VM_BUG_ON()s
introduced to m[un]lock_vma_page().
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>
mm/mlock.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.26-rc5-mm3/mm/mlock.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.26-rc5-mm3.orig/mm/mlock.c 2008-06-16 09:47:28.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.26-rc5-mm3/mm/mlock.c 2008-06-16 09:48:27.000000000 -0400
@@ -80,12 +80,12 @@ void __clear_page_mlock(struct page *pag
* Mark page as mlocked if not already.
* If page on LRU, isolate and putback to move to unevictable list.
*
- * Called with page locked and page_mapping() != NULL.
+ * Called with page locked and page->mapping != NULL.
*/
void mlock_vma_page(struct page *page)
{
BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
- VM_BUG_ON(!page_mapping(page));
+ VM_BUG_ON(!page->mapping);
if (!TestSetPageMlocked(page)) {
inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_MLOCK);
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ void mlock_vma_page(struct page *page)
/*
* called from munlock()/munmap() path with page supposedly on the LRU.
*
- * Called with page locked and page_mapping() != NULL.
+ * Called with page locked and page->mapping != NULL.
*
* Note: unlike mlock_vma_page(), we can't just clear the PageMlocked
* [in try_to_munlock()] and then attempt to isolate the page. We must
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ void mlock_vma_page(struct page *page)
static void munlock_vma_page(struct page *page)
{
BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
- VM_BUG_ON(!page_mapping(page));
+ VM_BUG_ON(!page->mapping);
if (TestClearPageMlocked(page)) {
dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_MLOCK);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists