lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:26:50 +0200
From:	Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
CC:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Adam Belay <ambx1@....rr.com>,
	Adam M Belay <abelay@....edu>,
	Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
	Matthieu Castet <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>,
	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 15/18] PNP: support optional IRQ resources

On 16-06-08 17:41, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

>>> @@ -176,33 +184,10 @@ static void quirk_ad1815_mpu_resources(s
>>>  	if (!irq || irq->next)
>>>  		return;
>>>  
>>> -	res = dev->dependent;
>>> -	if (!res)
>>> -		return;
>>> -
>>> -	while (1) {
>>> -		struct pnp_irq *copy;
>>> -
>>> -		copy = pnp_alloc(sizeof *copy);
>>> -		if (!copy)
>>> -			break;
>>> -
>>> -		bitmap_copy(copy->map.bits, irq->map.bits, PNP_IRQ_NR);
>>> -		copy->flags = irq->flags;
>>> -
>>> -		copy->next = res->irq; /* Yes, this is NULL */
>>> -		res->irq = copy;
>>> -
>>> -		if (!res->next)
>>> -			break;
>>> -		res = res->next;
>>> -	}
>>> -	kfree(irq);
>>> +	irq->flags |= IORESOURCE_IRQ_OPTIONAL;
>>> +	dev_info(&dev->dev, "made independent IRQ optional\n");
>>>  
>>>  	res->next = quirk_isapnp_mpu_options(dev);
>> 
>> ... this line should just go.
> 
> You mean I should delete the "res->next = quirk_isapnp_mpu_options(dev)"
> line?

Yes. With the optional flag, ad1815 doesn't need the cloning and due to 
the below it's actively wrong at this point in the series.

>> Previously "res" ended up as the last dependent set through the while 
>> loop but now it's the independendent set which in this previous setup of 
>> things shouldn't even have a ->next. Just deleting this line makes this 
>> patch fine and
>>
>> Acked-by: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
> 
> OK.  This will mean replacing patches 15 and 18 in this series.  If
> I repost those two, is that easy for you to deal with, Andrew?
> 
> If I replace these, I'll also update patch 18 to fix the
> pnp_independent_option() comment Rene made.

Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ