[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080616164609.GM20851@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:46:10 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
righi.andrea@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] relay: Fix race condition which occurs when reading across CPUs.
On Mon, Jun 16 2008, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:22:49 -0400
> Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Eduard,
>
> Hi.
>
> > Two objections against this. First, taking a spinlock _is_ slow in SMP
> > because it involves synchronized atomic operations.
>
> In any case, if we use relay in a hot path, we are doing debugging, so
> a couple of atomic operations won't be a big problem. Along with
> setting affinity, this shouldn't be a problem.
Ehm no, that is a completely false claim. Relay speed does matter, a
great deal. We rely heavily on eg blktrace being as ligt weight as
possible to capture millions of events in a very short time frame
without impacting performance too much. Relay is NOT just for debugging.
So I completely agree with Mathieu here, and I'm not a big fan of the
proposed solution.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists