[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1213635286.7238.13.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:54:46 -0400
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To: Chuck Lever <chucklever@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Staubach <staubach@...hat.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] knfsd: nfsd: Handle ERESTARTSYS from syscalls.
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 11:09 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> I think an error reply is much better than no reply in nearly every
> case. NFS3ERR_JUKEBOX/NFS4ERR_DELAY is an interesting idea, but
> something else again will probably be required for v4.1 with sessions.
NFS3ERR_JUKEBOX/NFS4ERR_DELAY may be inappropriate if the nfs daemon has
already started handling the RPC call, since you may be interrupting a
non-idempotent operation.
The only complete solution to this problem is NFSv4.1 with persistent
sessions.
Cheers
Trond
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists