[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080616130503.1a3a72dc.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:05:03 -0500
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: ying.huang@...el.com, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
yhlu.kernel@...il.com, steiner@....com, travis@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] x86 boot: allow overlapping ebda and efi memmap
memory ranges
hpa wrote:
> We *are* going to have similar hacks. That's not a question.
I agree ;) That's not the question. I have no religious objection
to hacks. I just try to keep their population in check. In some
cases (PC BIOS and EFI come to mind ;) I am less successful than
in other cases.
> *Not* perpetuating may ... cause odd behaviours that only are
> noticeable when you, say, boot from one OS into another.
So I take it you are saying that the future permutations and, in this
case with nested boots, combinations are sufficiently diverse and
unpredictable that as a practical matter we should perpeturate this
(gentle) hack.
I'm fine with that.
Huang - would you agree to this safety reservation of the ebda area
even on EFI enabled systems?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists